I'm not following the new trends specifically for rna-seq so are there something more innovative or the old TUXEDO Tophat-cufflinks-cuffdiff etc are still good reliable and considered as standard? ( which can be easy inplemented in Galaxy)
Heads up! This is a static archive of our support site. Please go to help.galaxyproject.org if you want to reach the Galaxy community. If you want to search this archive visit the Galaxy Hub search
Question: RNA-seq pipeline standard?
0
vebaev • 130 wrote:
0
mrals • 0 wrote:
Hello!
The standard methods are reliable, although there have been efficiency, precision, and accuracy improvements that can be found out there. There are always improvements in workflows to be gained from benchmark studies and good quantitative comparisons. I have found that for the most part, the new algorithms are preferable to get the general picture, but I do not have any quantitative information to say that newer algorithms are "better" in any meaningful way beyond what is already available in the literature. Have you heard of the "pseudo-alignment" methods? They are a fascinating approach to streaming read alignment and quantitation.
Please log in to add an answer.
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User
Agreement
and Privacy
Policy.
Powered by Biostar
version 16.09
Traffic: 172 users visited in the last hour