Question: Re: Quality Based Trimming
0
gravatar for Florent Angly
7.9 years ago by
Florent Angly370
Florent Angly370 wrote:
Thanks for your reply Daniel. That's right... I did not even think about using the boxplot tool to find how much to trim the ends. My reads all have the same length, but still, is seems more natural to only trim as much as needed and no more. For example, I have some reads that are completely low quality and should entirely trimmed/removed, whereas some might of good quality over almost all their length. It's probaby better to use a short sliding window (of, say, 5 bp) and trim the ends until the window has no more than, say zero low quality base pairs. So, the following sequence would be converted from: xxxoxooooooxxooooooxoxxx to: ooooooxxoooooo Florent
• 951 views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 7.9 years ago by Daniel Blankenberg ♦♦ 1.7k • written 7.9 years ago by Florent Angly370
0
gravatar for Yanwei Tan
7.9 years ago by
Yanwei Tan40
Yanwei Tan40 wrote:
Hi all, I have a question regarding the trimming length. I would like to trim my the last part 36 bp from my 76 bp reads, then I can compare the result between 36 bp (first part of 76bp) and 76 bp (the whole part). So here I want to ask if I can download the trimed reads from Galaxy. Many thanks! Wei -- Yanwei Tan Institute of Neurobiology 1.OG, AG Bading Im Neuenheimer Feld 364 University of Heidelberg 69120 Heidelberg Germany Tel:+49-6221-548319 Fax:+49-6221-546700
ADD COMMENTlink written 7.9 years ago by Yanwei Tan40
Hi Wei, You can download your results from Galaxy at any time by clicking on the Save (disk) icon associated with your dataset, shown after clicking on the dataset's name to expand the view. Thanks for using Galaxy, Dan
ADD REPLYlink written 7.9 years ago by Daniel Blankenberg ♦♦ 1.7k
0
gravatar for Daniel Blankenberg
7.9 years ago by
Daniel Blankenberg ♦♦ 1.7k
United States
Daniel Blankenberg ♦♦ 1.7k wrote:
Hi Florent, Thanks very much for the comments. A sliding window sounds like an excellent approach: allow users to specify the window size, step size, an aggregation action to perform on the window (min, max, sum, mean, etc ), a comparison method (<,<=, ==, etc) and a threshold quality value; allowing users to specify the ends (both or only one or the other) to trim would also likely be useful. Would it also be desirable to allow specifying a number of quality scores that can be excluded from the aggregation action (the zero low quality base pairs in your example)? A window size of 1 would handle the simple case of only trimming the very ends while allowing the user to configure more complex windowing schemes. Thoughts? Thanks, Dan
ADD COMMENTlink written 7.9 years ago by Daniel Blankenberg ♦♦ 1.7k
That sounds perfect Daniel. Advanced options for advanced users, and safe defaults for everyone else will do it. Florent
ADD REPLYlink written 7.9 years ago by Florent Angly370
Hi Florent, I've added a tool which will do this to the repository. It is currently available on the test server and will be on the main server next week. Thanks, Dan
ADD REPLYlink written 7.9 years ago by Daniel Blankenberg ♦♦ 1.7k
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 16.09
Traffic: 95 users visited in the last hour