Question: Concatenate datasets tail-to-head with and without the (cat)
0
gravatar for rpink
13 months ago by
rpink • 10
rpink • 10 wrote:

Hello, I have FASTq files created across four different flow cells from the same sample, so want to put them together for analysis. I have run them through Concatenate datasets tail-to-head (cat) (Galaxy Version 0.1.0), but then realised that there is a Concatenate datasets tail-to-head (Galaxy Version 1.0.0) WITHOUT the (cat)....is there a difference? I guess I just go for the newer version of without cat

Many thanks Ryan

galaxy • 486 views
ADD COMMENT • link • modified 13 months ago • written 13 months ago by rpink • 10
2
gravatar for Bjoern Gruening
13 months ago by
Bjoern Gruening ♦ 5.1k
Germany
Bjoern Gruening ♦ 5.1k wrote:

The only difference is in the implementation and the user interface. Both should do the job. The one with cat in it should be more performant.

ADD COMMENT • link written 13 months ago by Bjoern Gruening ♦ 5.1k
0
gravatar for rpink
13 months ago by
rpink • 10
rpink • 10 wrote:

great, thank you! Appreciated

ADD COMMENT • link written 13 months ago by rpink • 10
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 16.09
Traffic: 169 users visited in the last hour