PLS COMMENT ON THE DATA
SHOULD IT BE CONSIDERED OR DISCARDED ?
SOURCE : RNASeq : SRX273486 File: ftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/fastq/SRR837/SRR837506/SRR837506.fastq.gz
Heads up! This is a static archive of our support site. Please go to help.galaxyproject.org if you want to reach the Galaxy community. If you want to search this archive visit the Galaxy Hub search
Question: FASTA QC ON GROOMER DATA :
0
pinakin76 • 0 wrote:
3
Jennifer Hillman Jackson ♦ 25k wrote:
Hello,
This is your decision, yet I can agree this represents a low quality, short sequence length sample.
Jen, Galaxy team
1
pinakin76 • 0 wrote:
Thanks a lot again Jennifer will the data yield significant results on NGS analysis and will it be valid or misleading?
1
one has to decide what can be done with data. Sometime it is the samples that will always provide low level of difficult sequencing. Can you afford to keep on repeating the sequencing or just not do it? It depends on what you decide.
Please log in to add an answer.
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User
Agreement
and Privacy
Policy.
Powered by Biostar
version 16.09
Traffic: 183 users visited in the last hour