Question: Concatenate datasets tail-to-head with and without the (cat)
0
gravatar for rpink
8 months ago by
rpink10
rpink10 wrote:

Hello, I have FASTq files created across four different flow cells from the same sample, so want to put them together for analysis. I have run them through Concatenate datasets tail-to-head (cat) (Galaxy Version 0.1.0), but then realised that there is a Concatenate datasets tail-to-head (Galaxy Version 1.0.0) WITHOUT the (cat)....is there a difference? I guess I just go for the newer version of without cat

Many thanks Ryan

galaxy • 326 views
ADD COMMENTlink modified 8 months ago • written 8 months ago by rpink10
2
gravatar for Bjoern Gruening
8 months ago by
Bjoern Gruening5.0k
Germany
Bjoern Gruening5.0k wrote:

The only difference is in the implementation and the user interface. Both should do the job. The one with cat in it should be more performant.

ADD COMMENTlink written 8 months ago by Bjoern Gruening5.0k
0
gravatar for rpink
8 months ago by
rpink10
rpink10 wrote:

great, thank you! Appreciated

ADD COMMENTlink written 8 months ago by rpink10
Please log in to add an answer.

Help
Access

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by Biostar version 16.09
Traffic: 109 users visited in the last hour